Gunships at the time were very small vessels mainly used for colonial policing.Gunships? It's a term that sounds powerful and that credits the defining feature of that type of ship (their uniform big gun batteries).
Gunships at the time were very small vessels mainly used for colonial policing.Gunships? It's a term that sounds powerful and that credits the defining feature of that type of ship (their uniform big gun batteries).
Gunships at the time were very small vessels mainly used for colonial policing.
Hah!They could also be named after the creator, soo Fishers, or Cuniberti (think that was the French guy).
Both the Admiral and Trafalgar classes (and Devastation before them) were rather low freeboard, which was what I was talking about the effective split of capital ships in the ironclad era: the true ocean ironclads with high freeboard but lacking (or at best side mounted) turrets and turreted but low freeboard. The Royal Sovereign and Majestic finally went "why not both?" and did exactly that. That's the revolutionary aspect.They were less revolutionary more evolutionary, you can see their lineage from Devastation through to the Admiral and Trafalgar class. It was effectively the ultimate evolution of what Reed had been thinking about since the 1860s and Devastation in the 1870s. Comparison could be made with the Majestics and Nevadas in terms of getting a good template and basically building off it (though political reasons in the States had an impact)
Dreadnought was 'revolutionary' in terms of being an all big gun ship with turbine technology that completely outclassed pre dreadnoughts. The concept of 'all big gun BB with turbines' didn't go away.
They were effectively the Trafalgars with higher freeboard. That is evolutionary. Lumping the Sovereigns and Majestics into one is also misleading, they were some four years apart and you can see the evolution of the design from that. Royal Sovereigns main guns were mounted in open pear shaped barbettes to compensate for the higher freeboard, Hood, with enclosed turrets had much lower freeboard. You then saw more improvement with smaller battleships like Renown and Centurion which had smaller turreted guns and high freeboard, then ultimately culminating in the Majestics.Both the Admiral and Trafalgar classes (and Devastation before them) were rather low freeboard, which was what I was talking about the effective split of capital ships in the ironclad era: the true ocean ironclads with high freeboard but lacking (or at best side mounted) turrets and turreted but low freeboard. The Royal Sovereign and Majestic finally went "why not both?" and did exactly that. That's the revolutionary aspect.
Wasn't the way the cookie crumbled.Dreadnought was merely bigger, faster, stronger (basic pop evolution all things considered, not to mention the real game changer of director firing didn't even show up until a couple of classes later), and the particular ship in question managed to finish before her evolutionary predecessor intermediates (the Lord Nelson class) which is more a testament of UK shipbuilding prowess and Fisher's drive. If she was delayed in launch after these (or even the other) "semi-dreadnoughts", then her evolutionary-ness would have been much clearer.
Dreadnought is also nationalistically neutral unlike the names of places, battles or heros.I think that one big thing would be how easy it is to say. "Dreadnaught" is nice and compact and easy.
Interesting, I drew up a similar concept years ago without knowing about that.Nonsuch's ??
All the World's Battlecruisers-Jacky Fisher’s 1882 “battle cruisers” HMS Nonsuch and Inflexible.
On this thread ‘[url=a-second-drake-at-coronel-t8788.html#unread]a-second-drake-at-coronel-t8788.html#unread[/url]’, PMN1 asked me if I had any inwww.tapatalk.com
He was Italian, but yeah, he was someone who was a big advocate of developing what we'd consider dreadnoughts.They could also be named after the creator, soo Fishers, or Cuniberti (think that was the French guy).
During WWI, the Pennsylvania class were called 'Super-Dreadnought' in the popular PressMaybe just "super battleships"? It sounds dumb but it sounds like something the American media would come up with. It might distinguish them from plain old battleships AKA pre dreadnoughts.
In British press any battleship with 13.5 inch guns or bigger tended to be called super-dreadnoughts. So anything after the Orion class.During WWI, the Pennsylvania class were called 'Super-Dreadnought' in the popular Press