The OP was talking specifically about the Soviet Union. Having the USSR as an Axis power would change the war significantly, but it's not possible. German and Soviet interests clashed. A war was going to have to be fought between the two.
Sweden would have to start rearming sooner and /or on a larger scale to make an effective contribution to the Axis war effort. However, to be fair, that's also necessary for some of the countries that I have suggested and some of those suggested by others.Norway alone is insubstantial, but I wonder what if all of Scandinavia was in an alliance or pact. Say Sweden was in WWI because of Admiral Essen. Or otherwise anti-Soviet enough by WWII time to join the Axis. Finland would already be interested.
Correct.The OP was talking specifically about the Soviet Union.
Correct & correct.Having the USSR as an Axis power would change the war significantly, but it's not possible.
Once again, correct & correct.German and Soviet interests clashed. A war was going to have to be fought between the two.
There were already a bunch of countries in the Axis. For there to be a 4th power,it would have to be a reasonably large country. The only ones I can think of are Spain, Poland, Brazil and Argentina. Polish interests clash with Germany and Brazil and Argentina are too far away to count on help from the Axis. It has to be Spain, but they're recovering from a Civil War.Correct.
Correct & correct.
Once again, correct & correct.
Which is why I and others have suggested alternative countries, which have varying degrees of plausibility of joining the Axis, and the differences they might make.
All correct. The title of the thread is misleading. It should have been, "What if there was a fourth Major Axis power?" Which I think is what @estonian man meant.There were already a bunch of countries in the Axis. For there to be a 4th power, it would have to be a reasonably large country. The only ones I can think of are Spain, Poland, Brazil and Argentina. Polish interests clash with Germany and Brazil and Argentina are too far away to count on help from the Axis. It has to be Spain, but they're recovering from a Civil War.
would ww2 even start if france was in it ?France is an obvious one. There were certainly those within the Nazi hierarchy who wanted Vichy in the Axis
Fromnwhat over read on this site is that Hitler actually downplayed his antisemitism and tuned up his anti Slavic rhetoric. I think he would have made peace with the soviets if he had access to resources. Especially if he could force Vichy France to bend more to German demandsProblem is you are fundamentally changing Hitler’s motives for WW2. He felt like a war between the “Aryan race“ (Nazis) and the “Slavic hordes” (Soviets) was inevitable. The other fronts were only fought to maintain and support the war in the East. Any treaty with the Soviets was always going to be temporary.
It's "What if Operation Catapult provoked Vichy France into declaring war on Great Britain?"Would WW2 even start if France was in it?
I doubt England would help Poland alone.
It's "What if Operation Catapult provoked Vichy France into declaring war on Great Britain?"
According to one of the British official histories it was "touch and go" for about a week afterwards. That's according to "Grand Strategy Volume 2" or "The Mediterranean & Middle East, Volume 1".
The OP was talking specifically about the Soviet Union. Having the USSR as an Axis power would change the war significantly, but it's not possible. German and Soviet interests clashed. A war was going to have to be fought between the two.
I don't think it was that strange. Japan was a revisionist power. So was Germany. Their interests were broadly aligned.IDK what scenario would change this dynamic, certainly it would not occur out of thin air in 1940 -41? there needs to be some change(s) during the interwar period.
historically the von Seeckt plan was for cooperation with the USSR and China to avoid the effects of any blockades, one can argue that is a better plan than their strange alliance with Japan.
IDK sort of an Allied blunder bombing Baku how the USSR could be leveraged into the Axis or at least remain a collaborator?
It frees up a large number of German & Italian troops later in the war who had to occupy Yugoslavia. By 1944 Tito was tying down a couple hundred thousand Axis troops.That's kind of interesting. At a minimum, having Yugoslavia in the Axis butterfly's some of Mussolini's stupider invasions of Greece and Yugoslavia, and frees up Italian forces for north africa and elsewhere. And it means that Germany doesn't waste time, money and manpower bailing out Italy. Not sure whether it would make any other differences.
No. Hitler had plans for the Poles. He wanted their land, and to reduce the people to a slave population. Hitler despised the Polish People. He thought of Poles as only one step above the Jews.With a different approach Poland could be a good fit. Anti-Russian, similar views on minorities. Could Hitler cut a deal to regain Danzig and compensate Poland with a eastwards revision of the border with the Soviet Union, and perhaps some chunks of Lithuanian territory? Poland was the the 4th largest army in Europe in 1939.
Americans, British, and Brazilians. Just for the asking they get Chile into the coalition. Ether by a reversal of policy, or a coup Argentina would be the first country to leave the Axis. The Pact of Steel would rust very quickly. Argentina is just too vulnerable to economic, and military pressure.There would be the Falklands, but I doubt Argentinian leadership would think that would outweigh the risks of war with the combined forces of the USA and the British Commonwealth/Empire.
Economic pressure. Doubtful. Argentina could feed itself and was self-sufficient in oil. It could reply to economic sanctions by nationalising the Argentine companies owned by the British.Americans, British, and Brazilians. Just for the asking they get Chile into the coalition. Ether by a reversal of policy, or a coup Argentina would be the first country to leave the Axis. The Pact of Steel would rust very quickly. Argentina is just too vulnerable to economic, and military pressure.