Can we get a look in on Max and Mexico? With maybe a peek at the shitshow that (presumably) is Central America?
Def hold that thought
Figure Boston Fruit is setting up shop and propping up governments down in the Isthmus.
Oh certainly, I just need to figure out what that would even look like. Considering the paucity of English language sources on Honduras I might just need to start making random fruit warlords up
with the collapse of the Guatemalan state could Mexico annex it?
Do they have the political and economical capital to endure such an annexation?
I suspect they could, though probably not for a few years - perhaps in the mid-20s or early 30s.

Arguably, Mexico exited the GAW in better shape than any of the Bloc Sud powers (Brazil got territorial concessions and 'won' but at a heavy cost and is suffering high political instability). Its most certainly suffering its own problems, but seems to be in a good position to weather the storm - especially with the Prince Regent running the Regency as well.

If they okay their cards right, and agree to not interfere too strongly with American business, Mexico could move in to 'restore order' and even win the blessing of Philadelphia - so long as they bide their time and wait for the US to grow concerned with the chronic political violence in the former Centeo.
They could probably, eventually. It’d be an interesting thing for them to do, that’s for sure
Why the Spanish name for a Brazilian?
Typo 🤷‍♂️
 
The Radical Republic
"...outer boundaries of what an "Alemist" foreign policy might look like; indeed, it was one that Argentine had subtly carried out for years. Though their influence over Uruguay had collapsed entirely, Argentina had rather deepened her ties with Paraguay dramatically, and the Alemist influence upon the Azules who had emerged victorious from that country's long and fractious civil conflicts in the previous twenty years looked an awful lot like the crumbling Civic Union. Eduardo Schaerer had been the first President in Paraguyan history to complete his mandate without a coup and while he was succeeded by a fellow Liberal in the young and more radical Jose Pedro Montero, it was nonetheless a peaceful transfer of power from one President to another after an election regarded as mostly free of irregularities. Schaerer had strengthened Paraguay's institutions, reformed its military by promoting dozens of young new officers from the educated urban intellectual class rather than scions of the landed oligarchy, and made enormous efforts to improve not only the welfare of Spanish-descended and immigrant peoples, of which there were increasingly many, but also the indigenous Guarani. Secure as a neutral ground that could trade with all combatants during the Great American War, cottage industries had sprung up across Paraguay, and Asuncion's position had left it an important forum for diplomacy.

If the influence of Alemist thinking over Paraguay and the Radicals of Chile was clear, it was less so in Bolivia, which was rapidly charging the opposite direction under its own Liberal Party, which represented the more laissez-faire and oligarchic school of 19th century liberalism in contrast to the radicalism en vogue elsewhere in the Cone. Ismael Montes had ridden his 1915 triumph at Lima in securing the Littoral Province for Bolivia once again to a crushing success in the mid-term Congressional vote, one which was allegedly highly fraudulent and used the military to intimidate illiterate native voters, and thereafter set about purging Bolivia's small and already corrupt bureaucracy of his enemies while promoting military friends favorable to him and bullying the Church into silence. This all culminated in the election of Jose Gutierrez Guerra, a wealthy and powerful La Paz banker who had only just been elected to Congress in 1914 and seemed to have emerged out of nowhere to succeed Montes; in part due to the assassination of former general and opposition leader Jose Manuel Pando, there was no way to have a truly free election in Bolivia, especially after nearly twenty years of Liberal control of the country.

Had the Littoral not been returned at the conclusion of a stirring military victory over the hated Chileans, Gutierrez's time may have been quite unstable and could well have ended "early," as so many Latin American Presidencies often did. But the afterglow of Lima was still strong, and Bolivians had in the years after the return of the Littoral seen a dramatic rise in living standards (at least in cities like La Paz, which were booming); unlike the severe and increasingly chronic economic malaise that had plagued most of South America since 1915-16, Bolivia seemed to be in the midst of a golden age, one that made Gutierrez confident enough to make noises that he intended to break from Montes and pursue a number of genuine public works projects through the fattened treasury.

In some cases, however, Gutierrez was very much like Montes, such as in Bolivia's increasing interest in the Chaco. The area has in the high plateaus of western Paraguay, claimed by both countries, arid and seemingly worthless until the suggestion in late 1918 by a number of geologists that it could in fact enjoy high levels of mineral wealth, in particular oil; Bolivia, with its large mining industry, was even more interested in those lands than it had ever been before. Of course, the biggest problem with their mounting claims over the Chaco, buffeted by Bolivian confidence bordering on arrogance after their war with Chile, was that the Chaco covered more than half of Paraguay's claimed borders, and for a country that had a grievously traumatic 19th century, Paraguay was not about to see its territories further reduced and Bolivian armies permanently stationed across from Asuncion.

The tensions thus rising, Argentinean policymakers saw a familiar story to the one in Uruguay at the start of the decade, and this time they were determined they would not see another country gradually moving towards progressivism be bullied by a larger neighbor into surrender..."

- The Radical Republic
 
Bolivia seems to have caught victory disease from Chile...

We have seen Bolivia, how is Peru doing in the meanwhile? IIRC they also had a few border disputes with meighbors at this time...
 
"...outer boundaries of what an "Alemist" foreign policy might look like; indeed, it was one that Argentine had subtly carried out for years. Though their influence over Uruguay had collapsed entirely, Argentina had rather deepened her ties with Paraguay dramatically, and the Alemist influence upon the Azules who had emerged victorious from that country's long and fractious civil conflicts in the previous twenty years looked an awful lot like the crumbling Civic Union. Eduardo Schaerer had been the first President in Paraguyan history to complete his mandate without a coup and while he was succeeded by a fellow Liberal in the young and more radical Jose Pedro Montero, it was nonetheless a peaceful transfer of power from one President to another after an election regarded as mostly free of irregularities. Schaerer had strengthened Paraguay's institutions, reformed its military by promoting dozens of young new officers from the educated urban intellectual class rather than scions of the landed oligarchy, and made enormous efforts to improve not only the welfare of Spanish-descended and immigrant peoples, of which there were increasingly many, but also the indigenous Guarani. Secure as a neutral ground that could trade with all combatants during the Great American War, cottage industries had sprung up across Paraguay, and Asuncion's position had left it an important forum for diplomacy.

If the influence of Alemist thinking over Paraguay and the Radicals of Chile was clear, it was less so in Bolivia, which was rapidly charging the opposite direction under its own Liberal Party, which represented the more laissez-faire and oligarchic school of 19th century liberalism in contrast to the radicalism en vogue elsewhere in the Cone. Ismael Montes had ridden his 1915 triumph at Lima in securing the Littoral Province for Bolivia once again to a crushing success in the mid-term Congressional vote, one which was allegedly highly fraudulent and used the military to intimidate illiterate native voters, and thereafter set about purging Bolivia's small and already corrupt bureaucracy of his enemies while promoting military friends favorable to him and bullying the Church into silence. This all culminated in the election of Jose Gutierrez Guerra, a wealthy and powerful La Paz banker who had only just been elected to Congress in 1914 and seemed to have emerged out of nowhere to succeed Montes; in part due to the assassination of former general and opposition leader Jose Manuel Pando, there was no way to have a truly free election in Bolivia, especially after nearly twenty years of Liberal control of the country.

Had the Littoral not been returned at the conclusion of a stirring military victory over the hated Chileans, Gutierrez's time may have been quite unstable and could well have ended "early," as so many Latin American Presidencies often did. But the afterglow of Lima was still strong, and Bolivians had in the years after the return of the Littoral seen a dramatic rise in living standards (at least in cities like La Paz, which were booming); unlike the severe and increasingly chronic economic malaise that had plagued most of South America since 1915-16, Bolivia seemed to be in the midst of a golden age, one that made Gutierrez confident enough to make noises that he intended to break from Montes and pursue a number of genuine public works projects through the fattened treasury.

In some cases, however, Gutierrez was very much like Montes, such as in Bolivia's increasing interest in the Chaco. The area has in the high plateaus of western Paraguay, claimed by both countries, arid and seemingly worthless until the suggestion in late 1918 by a number of geologists that it could in fact enjoy high levels of mineral wealth, in particular oil; Bolivia, with its large mining industry, was even more interested in those lands than it had ever been before. Of course, the biggest problem with their mounting claims over the Chaco, buffeted by Bolivian confidence bordering on arrogance after their war with Chile, was that the Chaco covered more than half of Paraguay's claimed borders, and for a country that had a grievously traumatic 19th century, Paraguay was not about to see its territories further reduced and Bolivian armies permanently stationed across from Asuncion.

The tensions thus rising, Argentinean policymakers saw a familiar story to the one in Uruguay at the start of the decade, and this time they were determined they would not see another country gradually moving towards progressivism be bullied by a larger neighbor into surrender..."

- The Radical Republic
Interesting developments! Keep up the good work!

Please tell me we will see peru soon!
 
Why the Spanish name for a Brazilian?
...what?
As a native Spanish speaker, I can guarantee you nascimiento is not a Spanish-language word or name, and to me, it looks awfully Portuguese (which isn't to say it is Portuguese, just that it looks Portuguese to me).
 
Bolivia seems to have caught victory disease from Chile...
Would be low-key hilarious if Bolivia is the one caught in the resource curse as a result of their re-liberated lands in the Atacama while Chile is successful despite losing said lands at Lima.

I have a soft spot for Chile - they're one of my favorite random countries - and I'm hoping they do well in the medium and long term.
 
I hope Paraguay does well, in otl they only had a real democracy since a general overthrew there “poor man’s nazi Germany” dictatorship.
 
I hope Paraguay does well, in otl they only had a real democracy since a general overthrew there “poor man’s nazi Germany” dictatorship.
It would be a vast improvement if Stroessner didn’t come to power. The guy literally listen to his political rival being dismember by chainsaw on the phone.
 
"[1] What I'd say to these people is if they think Canalejas is bad, they could cross over into OTL and see how the Second Republic was for their brand of politics."
The PCT does remind of CEDA in that both parties are committed to some form of accidentalism. Both are also anti-system parties that reject the current political order but are to a degree prepared to work within the system to advance their aims. A main difference however is that the PCT still sees the restoration of the Bourbons as integral to its plan of re-catholicization whereas CEDA was more ambivalent. As I understood it CEDA wasn't oppose to the restoration of the monarchy but instead aimed to revise the Constitution and reduce its secularizing tendencies. There are also questions about whether or not CEDA was even that fascist or whether it was merely clericalist/authoritarian. It is still possible that the PCT might adopt elements of integrist theory and thus parallel the course taken by CEDA but it is too early to say.
 
Bolivia seems to have caught victory disease from Chile...

We have seen Bolivia, how is Peru doing in the meanwhile? IIRC they also had a few border disputes with meighbors at this time...
To be honest, I need to plan out what to do with Peru in the 20th century a bit more. I do know the Leguia brothers are quite comfortable after Lima, though.
Would be low-key hilarious if Bolivia is the one caught in the resource curse as a result of their re-liberated lands in the Atacama while Chile is successful despite losing said lands at Lima.

I have a soft spot for Chile - they're one of my favorite random countries - and I'm hoping they do well in the medium and long term.
That’s sort of the idea; Chile will just be sort of doing its own thing for a while.
I hope Paraguay does well, in otl they only had a real democracy since a general overthrew there “poor man’s nazi Germany” dictatorship.
It would be a vast improvement if Stroessner didn’t come to power. The guy literally listen to his political rival being dismember by chainsaw on the phone.
He also hired Joseph mengele to run concentration camps for his enemies
Was he the guy who coined “for my friends everthing, for my enemies - the law”?
The PCT does remind of CEDA in that both parties are committed to some form of accidentalism. Both are also anti-system parties that reject the current political order but are to a degree prepared to work within the system to advance their aims. A main difference however is that the PCT still sees the restoration of the Bourbons as integral to its plan of re-catholicization whereas CEDA was more ambivalent. As I understood it CEDA wasn't oppose to the restoration of the monarchy but instead aimed to revise the Constitution and reduce its secularizing tendencies. There are also questions about whether or not CEDA was even that fascist or whether it was merely clericalist/authoritarian. It is still possible that the PCT might adopt elements of integrist theory and thus parallel the course taken by CEDA but it is too early to say.
The Bourbon hard-on will limit PCT’s long term appeal, especially since the Hohenzollern kings are still pretty conservative (Carlos Jose even once mulled lending his imprimatur to a military coup) just more of the Prussian brand of the right rather than the Deus Vult kind.

So something more like National Action/CEDA that isn’t as… niche, shall we say, will probably emerge in time as the Canovist/Maurist Conservatives continue to decline
 
The tensions thus rising, Argentinean policymakers saw a familiar story to the one in Uruguay at the start of the decade, and this time they were determined they would not see another country gradually moving towards progressivism be bullied by a larger neighbor into surrender..."

- The Radical Republic
This is the "occasional conflicts" that the first entry said. OTL, they did go to war in 1932 and lasted until 1935. ITTL, I guess both are gonna go a decade of militization (Especially Bolivia). Paragruay is going to be strengthening it's military with Argentine support. It would be kind of funny if both Socialist Chile and Argentina join on Paragruay side and Bolivia get's the Paraguayan War treatment and Chile regains Littoral Province lol.
 
I wonder how strong the France of this TL would be if it didn't have any problems with low birth rates... the British would certainly be scared to death, since France has a much greater capacity to project power across the globe than the German Empire OTL.
 
Reading a very interesting book called "Generations" by Jean Twenge in anticipation of a workshop I'm running later this spring. It is a large book but chock-full of cool charts, graphs, and data - I'm enjoying it a lot so far.

I'm curious how generations are defined and labelled in the 20th Century USA ITTL. You'd have the Greatest Generation from circa 1880 to 1895 (the people who actually fought in trenches and worked in factories during the GAW), a generation correlating to our Silents/Traditionalists from circa 1896 to 1916 (the people alive during the war who were too young to fight/work) and a Boomer analogue from 1917 to roughly 1934 or so. I think there was a mention in an update to a post-war baby boom anyway so that last part does check out.

Obviously, everything after the mid 1930s is completely scrambled from OTL. It feels like technology is more or less the same level ITTL as opposed to OTL so you'd presumably have some sort of dot com boom in the late 1990s and the handheld revolution in the 00s/10s, which means our Xers, Millenials, and Zers could be mapped out ITTL if you want to go that way. But there's no chance of the vast social upheaval in our 1960s and early 1970s in this USA - a civil rights movement for Blacks won't really be a thing here for reasons we've discussed. Not sure about this timeline's second-wave feminism and gay rights movements either. I thought I saw somewhere our author wanted this timeline's 1960s to be reactionary as opposed to progressive like ours, but I could be dead wrong and I don't have time to look through the archives anyway this morning.

Anyway, just some random thoughts. Looking forward to seeing how it all unfolds!
 
Top